Results tagged ‘ salary cap ’
So, Major League Baseball announced today that baseball’s playoff format will be changing. There will now be two wild cards in each league, with each team playing a one-game playoff to decide who advances to the Division Series round, where it is then business as usual.
There are two things I like about this system:
1. It gives my Twins a better chance to make the playoffs! Heck, I wonder if the two consecutive one-game playoffs featuring the Twins in 08-09 and the excitement they created played a part in this decision!
2. How many times have we seen this rivalry during the regular season…
There is one major reason that I do not like this new format, however, and that is because I feel it is little more than a giant…
…for baseball’s lack of a salary cap. I realize that Selig wants more teams to have a shot at making the playoffs, and this format does just that. However, how much does it truly affect the competitive balance of the league? I would argue very little. The rich teams will still be rich, while the poor teams will still be poor.
Overall, though, I don’t mind the changes all that much and I guess we’ll just have to see what happens.
A few weeks ago, I wrote a blog post about the rough shape that major league baseball is in when it comes to parity and competitive balance. I was then challenged by another blogger to provide a solution to the problem. To me, the solution is relatively simple…it’s the implementation that is the tough part. Here are my thoughts…
First and foremost, baseball needs a salary cap akin to the system in the NFL. Sure, baseball has the luxury tax, but that is like asking a billionaire to pay a thousand-dollar fine everytime he does something wrong. It sounds like a lot, but to the billionaire it is relatively little, thus he will continue to repeat his bad behavior (e.g. buying up and keeping contracted all the best players). In the NFL, teams can only spend a certain amount (in 2009 the figure was $128 million) per season. Plus, there is even a “minimum floor” clause of sorts that says a team has to spend at least so much money (like a minimum speed limit on the freeway) in order to prevent some franchises from just packing it in and hoarding $$$ to line their wallets if the season isn’t shaping up as planned. Sure, there would still be bad teams. However, general suckish-ness would be based on poor team management, like, say, starting this guy at QB…
Secondly, the TV pot needs to be broadened as well…
Once again, the NFL (which I considered to have the best professional sports economic system out there today) requires TV rights to be shared between both teams competing. In baseball, all the revenue goes to the home club. So, the Yankees, because of their enormous and populace viewing area, can create their own TV network and rake in the dough, while the Twins (after trying that approach with Victory Sports Network and failing miserably) plod along with Fox Sports North and, comparatively speaking, get chump change in return.
Those two changes would go a long way towards making baseball much more economically sound (in terms of honoring the heritage of the game, not just turning the biggest possible profit by assuring the Yankees and Red Sox in the playoffs every year), and would not be all that difficult to implement. However, major obstacles still exist in the implementation of the plan.
The biggest problem (and this will probably be the biggest understatement I ever post on this blog) is this guy…
Allan H. “Bud” Selig, baseball’s commissioner, was once an owner himself (of the Milwaukee Brewers), so he is very sympathetic to their causes. Thus, he will NEVER impose sanctions on their freedom, even if it means destroying the fabric of the game in the process.
Because of this, the Players Union (once headed by Donald Fehr, but now led by Michael Weiner, pictured below)…
…won’t, and doesn’t, budge an inch, as they are always terrified that former owner Selig is out to get them. That is why implementing a salary cap or steroid testing is like pulling teeth. A new, much more impartial commissioner would go an incredibly long way towards rectifying the situation, but since the players are still raking in the dough and the owners are protected by Buddy-Boy, the status quo hasn’t quite been shaken enough yet to oust Selig.
Of course, in a certain humerous turn of events that even I can smile at, Selig’s contract expires after the 2012 season. In other words, right before the world is supposed to end (!)…
So, I guess our only hope is to pray that the Mayans were wrong…as after ’12 baseball might get back on the right track!
In the previous post, I made the point that the Twins have nobody to blame but themselves for the ALDS sweep at the hands of the Yankees. But is this really true?
This is kind of a touchy issue, at least for me, as it implies that the Twins (or any small-market “David” vs. a big-market “Goliath”) really never have much of a chance to compete against the “big boys” of the league.
Any competant baseball fan knows that the economic system of the game is messed up due to the fact that no salary cap is in place. Teams like the Yankees, Red Sox, and Angels (in the American League) have such a huge advantage over the Twins and Royals of the world that its a wonder any other team ever represents the league in the World Series (I guess that is the crapshoot of a playoff structure that features a 3-of-5 first round). Sure, Bud Selig’s supposedly brilliant luxury tax system (where, much like Robin Hood, the league robs from the rich to give to the poor) helps a little bit, but in reality all it ends up doing is narrowing the free agent pool each year (as the middle-market teams are able to lock up a few key players to long-term deals). It most definetly, however, does not prevent teams like the Yankees from nabbing the best free agents year after year (case in point: C.C. Sabathia and A.J. Burnett brought in before the start of this season). The Twins could never have dreamed of signing guys like that.
Of course, baseball will likely never changed (at least not with Selig at the helm), as the success of the Yanks, Sawx, and Halos fuels the revenue machine, especially in the World Series. Though it might provide some sanctity back into the game, nobody wants to see the Twins and Athletics, to use two examples, duking it out in the ALCS. If the MLB execs had it their way, it would be New York and Boston every single year.
The whole situation kind of reminds me of the infamous “You can’t handle the truth” speech from the movie A Few Good Men:
“My existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives…You don’t want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.”
While more parity would be great for baseball, it will never happen because admittedly it would weaken the short-term (until new rivalries are formed, at least) revenue stream of the league.
Thus, can the Twins even be expected to compete with the Yankees in any series? They have Sabathia and Burnett, we have Baker and Blackburn. They have the best middle of an order (Teixera, A-Rod, Matsui) since Ruth, Gehrig, and Lazzeri batted consecutively, while we have one stud (Mauer) and two others (Kubel, Cuddyer) that are by and large overmatched by quality pitching. They have guys like Melky Cabrera and Robinson Cano at the BOTTOM of the order, while we have Carlos Gomez, Nick Punto, and Jose Morales because they are all we can afford. They can throw arms like Joba Chamberlain and Phil Hughes at us, while he have Matt Guerrier and Jose Mijares. No comparison.
So, those are the two theories as to why our beloved Twins were brutalized by the hated Yanks. Which one is more valid? I think it is a mixture of both. The Twins would need to play a perfect series to even give themselves a chance to beat the Yankees, and instead we choked in every big opportunity.